The 65-year old owner of a multi-location retail operation doing $30 million in annual sales decided to retire. He interviewed a highly recommended intermediary and was impressed. However, he had a nephew who had just received his MBA and who told his uncle that he could handle the sale and save him some money. He would do it for half of what the intermediary said his fee would be – so the uncle decided to use his nephew. Now, his nephew was a nice young man, educated at one of the top business schools, but he had never been involved in a middle market deal. He had read a lot of case studies and was confident that he could “do the deal.”

Inexperience # 1 – The owner and the nephew agreed not to bring the CFO into the picture, nor execute a “stay” agreement. The nephew felt he could handle the financial details. Neither one of them realized that a potential purchaser would expect to meet with the CFO when it came to the finances of the business, and certainly would expect the CFO to be involved in the due diligence process.

Inexperience # 2 – It never occurred to the owner or his nephew that revealing just the name of the company to prospective buyers would send competitors and only mildly interested prospects to the various locations. There was no mention of Confidentiality Agreements.  Since the owner was not in a big hurry, there were no time limits set for offers or even term sheets. It would only be a matter of time before the word that the business was on the market would be out.

Inexperience # 3 – The owner wanted to spend some time with each prospective purchaser. Confidentiality didn’t seem to be an issue. There was no screening process, no interview by the nephew.

Inexperience # 4 – The nephew prepared what was supposed to be an Offering Memorandum. He threw some financials together that had not been audited, which included a missing $500,000 that the owner took and forgot to inform his nephew about. This obviously impacted the numbers. There were no projections, no ratios, etc. This lack of information would most likely result in lower offers or bids or just plain lack of buyer interest.  In addition, the mention of a pending lawsuit that could influence the sale was hidden in the Memorandum.

Inexperience # 5 – The owner and nephew both decided that their company attorney could handle the details of a sale if it ever got that far. Unfortunately, although competent, the attorney had never been involved in a business sale transaction, especially one in the $15 million range.

Results — The seller was placing almost his entire net worth in the hands of his nephew and an attorney who had no experience in putting transactions together. The owner decided to call most of the shots without any advice from an experienced dealmaker. Any one of the “inexperiences” could not only “blow” a sale, but also create the possibility of a leak. The discovery that the company was for sale could be catastrophic, whether discovered by the competition, an employee, a major customer or supplier .

The facts in the above story are true!

The moral of the story – Nephews are wonderful, but inexperience is fraught with danger. When considering the sale of a major asset, it is foolhardy not to employ experienced, knowledgeable professionals.  A professional intermediary is a necessity, as is an experienced transaction attorney.

Business Appraisers, before beginning an assignment, like to know the purpose of the appraisal. Usually the assignment demands “bullet proof” documentation: comparables, EBITDA multiples, projections, discount rates, etc.  Unfortunately, in situations where the purpose of the valuation is to establish a selling price, the business appraiser really doesn’t understand the business elements – or, since these business elements don’t figure into the numbers, they are largely ignored. However, they do have value; in some cases, significant value to a buyer.

Valuing these business elements requires that computers, adding machines and calculators be put aside. The business should be looked at from three key business elements: the Market, the Operations, and Post-Acquisition. These elements are certainly subjective, but also critically important to a prospective buyer.  A buyer’s opinion of the business elements can drive the actual offering price significantly higher—or lower. In fact, the business elements such as Fundamentals and Value Drivers can impact price as much as the Financials.

Here are some important questions to consider:

Market:   
Are there significant competitive threats?
Is there a large market potential?
Does the company have a reasonable market position?
Are there broad-based distribution channels?
Is there a wide customer base?
What’s the company’s competitive advantage?

Operations:
Are there significant alternative technologies?
Is sound management to remain?
Is there product/service diversity?
Are there multiple suppliers?

Many business owners feel that what prospective acquirers are looking for are quality and depth of management, market share, profitability, etc. Brian Tracy, in his book, The 100 Absolutely Unbreakable Laws of Business Success, states that the key ingredient is “a company-wide focus on marketing, sales and revenue generation. The most important energies of the most talented people in the company must be centered on the customer. The failures to focus single-mindedly on sales are the number one causes of business failures, which are triggered by a drop-off in sales.”

Tracy goes on to point out that company owners and/or presidents should observe industry trends, pay attention to what the competition is doing that works, and learn from them.  Find out what is successful and what isn’t in your industry – trends are vital. It is important to understand that established and mature companies are generally just trying to protect their market share, while start-up companies are really attempting to gain or establish market share.

Tracy estimates that 80 percent of new businesses close down within the first two years, and 100 either fall off or join the top 500 companies in the U.S. because they are acquired, merged or broken-up, and even a few actually fold – Enron being a good example.

Tracy also mentions that problem solving, decision making and team (not individual) collaboration are key factors.  However, as he points out, the best companies have the best people.

There once was a family-owned bakery that had sales in the millions. The bakery sold bread to restaurants, supermarkets and some retail outlets. The founder gave each of his 5 children 20 percent ownership of the business.  The kids really didn’t want to work in the business, so they turned the operation and management over to 2 members of the third generation.  For some years the business had been operating on a break-even basis, and sales were not increasing.

The founder’s children decided that they wanted to sell the business since they were close to retirement age. A professional business intermediary was retained to do this.  He contacted as many of the larger bakeries as possible, hoping to find a suitable acquirer, but there was very little interest. The intermediary continued his search, willing to do the hard work required to find a good buyer. He finally found a successful businessman who offered a price equal to 50 percent of sales – a generous offer.

The intermediary presented the offer to the five children – all equal partners.  Little did he know that he had walked into the proverbial hornet’s nest. A huge family argument ensued, and finally the intermediary was asked to leave the room so that the siblings could decide what to do.

The offer was turned down flat. There was no counter-proposal or even any negotiation on price, terms or conditions. The offer was dead. The intermediary had worked on trying to find the right buyer, figured he had – all to no avail, six months wasted.

It turns out that the major obstacle was thrown up by those two members of the third generation who had been operating the business. They feared that they might lose their jobs even though the prospective buyer assured the sellers that he would retain them.  Were they being unreasonable? The reality is that the operators were “family” – related in one way or another to the five owners, and blood is usually thicker than water.

Flash forward some 20 years.  The bakery is still in business with very little growth and still operating on a breakeven basis.  The five owners are now in their 70s, they have never received anything for their equity, and there is very little hope that they ever will.

The above is a true story.  It shows how a family can own a business and not be prepared or in agreement when it comes time to sell it. Although the bakery is still in business, it is barely hanging on. The story is sad as well as true. The proposed deal could have satisfied all of the owners’ goals and made their retirement years a lot more comfortable.

Family-owned businesses make up a lot of the non-public companies in the U.S., and according to industry reports, many of them will be up for sale in the near future.  In situations where the family owned business is owned by more than one person, it is crucial that a meeting be held with all of the family owners prior to electing to sell, unless a strong buy-sell agreement has already been agreed to.  This agreement should establish, among other things, specific guidelines about what happens if one family member wants out of the business.

At this meeting, the company attorney and accountant should be in attendance along with a business intermediary.  The reason to include the intermediary at this early stage is that he or she knows what the pitfalls are, what buyer concerns will be, and what should be done prior to going to market.

One of the major problems when there is more than one owner is communications. For example, one owner who is active in the business decides that he needs a new, expensive car and that the company should pay for it. This is the kind of issue a decision-forming meeting should bring to light and address. Strict guidelines should also be in writing concerning salaries, benefits, etc.  When one family member wants to cash out or another one spends a lot of money furnishing their office – it is too late to have an agreement drawn up to cover these possible roadblocks. The time is now!

This is just a partial list: Church’s Chicken, Uno Chicago Grill, Charlie Brown’s, Domino’s Pizza, Burger King, Cinnabon, Sizzler.  The first response would be that they are all in the food business, and that’s correct.  Now name the second thing that they all have in common?  Give up?  Well, they (and many others) have been purchased by private equity firms.  And, apparently, this is just the beginning.  The huge Dunkin Donuts chain is being sought after by two or three private equity firms.

Why the interest in restaurants from groups that most people associate with high tech?  Many firms got burned during the dot com and high tech meltdown.  Now these same private equity firms are looking at businesses that are stable, with more predictable earnings, and that are also very familiar businesses, time-tested and still have a lot of growth ahead.

One industry expert said in Nation’s Restaurant News, “What’s really driving this is the success of these deals, the numbers that the private equity companies are getting when they sell…”  For example, he noted, “Restaurant Associates bought Charlie Brown in 1975 for $3 million and sold it to Castle Harlan seven years later for $50 million.  Castle Harlan got almost three times that price – an appreciation of $90 million with the sale to Trimaran.”

If private equity and similar firms are now buying restaurants, what businesses are next?  If you are the owner of a small growing company or chain of businesses – is a private equity firm in your future?  A professional intermediary may be able to answer that question for you and if you are considering selling – they can also help.

When one sells their house, the best deal is usually the highest price.  When one decides to sell their business, there may be other factors to consider.  Many buyers are similar to the “overlooked” buyer described below, serious and qualified; and most sales of businesses are win-win transactions.  However, there are a few exceptions, and sellers should consider them carefully, balancing their prerequisites to the goals of the buyer.

Selling to a Competitor – Many company owners think this is the best way to go.  They read about the mega-mergers such as Bank of America and Fleet bank, or the pending deals such as Federated and the May Company Department Stores, and U.S. Air and American West.  Consolidation may play a major role in large public companies; this is not the case in middle market companies.

Many owners of middle market firms look at these mega-deals and think it might work for them.  However, upon further consideration, they realize that by disclosing a lot of confidential information to a competitor, their business could suffer irreparable damage if the deal would fall apart – and many do.

Selling to a Strategic Acquirer – This may bring the highest price, but there are several reasons why this may not be in the company’s best interest.  Many owners have worked with key employees for years and would not like to see them replaced. The strategic owner might not only replace members of management, but might also move the company to another part of the country.

Selling to a Financial Buyer – This buyer may not be willing to pay the seller’s price and is usually buying a company with intentions of selling it at a profit in three to five years.  This leaves the company and its employees in limbo waiting for a new owner to take over.

Other Buyers – The employees may decide to buy the company (ESOP).  However, this usually means a long-term payout for the owner. An individual buyer may come along such as a Warren Buffett, but what are the chances?  A key member or members of management might decide to purchase the company, but generally they won’t pay the price.  If a sale is not consummated, the key management member(s) will most likely leave.

The “Overlooked” Buyer – There are many individuals who want to own their own company.  They might be former executives of major companies who want to do something on their own. Some buyers have access to large amounts of investment capital. There are many qualified individual buyers in the market place. Russ Robb, the editor of a leading M& A newsletter, M&A Today, has written a book, Buying Your Own Business, for those individuals interested in buying their own company. This book has sold over 20,000 copies, which indicates the large number of people who are interested in buying a company.

There Is No Magic Answer – Selling a company comes with no guarantees.   When Badger Meter Company, a public company headquartered in Milwaukee, acquired Data Industrial Corporation based in Mattapoisett, Massachusetts, this appeared to be a marriage made in heaven.  Their respective product lines fit like a glove, their corporate cultures seemed compatible, and sales expansion by cross-selling was evident.

This strategic acquisition would have been fine except for one change.  The parent company moved Data Industrial’s operation to Kansas, and every employee’s job was terminated.  However, one should not construe that all acquisitions by strategic or competitive acquirers end up in a similar fate.  Furthermore, for price considerations, the seller can draft restrictions in the Purchase & Sale agreement to prevent the transfer of the business, at least for a specified time period.

Certainly selling to the overlooked type buyer doesn’t guarantee all of the seller’s concerns, but knowing the interests of some of the various buyer types can help insure that the goals of both buyer and seller are met.  Sellers should determine their goals prior to attempting to sell their business.  A consultation with a professional intermediary is a good start to this process.